feat(kyberforge): ADR-0020 context contract for skills and agents #103

Merged
Defame1297 merged 18 commits from refactor/trim-skills-agents-context into main 2026-08-16 21:20:02 +00:00

18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
54d7bd80ba docs: rule host built-ins out of the routing target universe
Closes the second open design decision on PR #103. The `/compact` finding was
recorded as a false positive needing an allowlist or a suppression mechanism.
It is neither: the routing universe is the apm marketplace, so a target either
resolves to a skill or an agent or it does not resolve, and `/compact`,
`/clear` and `/init` are Claude Code slash commands with no counterpart in
Copilot CLI or Codex. `.apm/` source compiles for all three, so a
vendor-neutral description routing to one is a portability defect and the hard
FAIL is a true positive.

An allowlist was rejected for a concrete reason, not a stylistic one: it
answers a different question ("does this exist on some host?"), it cannot
answer that portably from a single source file, and it goes stale the next
time a host ships a command — reintroducing the same-commit-two-verdicts
failure ADR-0020 already closed for deployed trees.

Nothing is blocked today: zero of the 43 descriptions name a host built-in,
and an author who needs to mention one writes it un-slashed, which is not
route notation and carries no routing claim.

Recorded in ADR-0020 and in both author-facing contract references, so the
next agent reads the decision rather than "fixing" the gate.

ADR: 0020

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 20:45:19 +00:00
75a13c82f6 fix(kyberforge): scope corroboration to a real sentence boundary
A prose-form routing target blocks a commit only when its own sentence names
another target that resolves. That makes the sentence splitter part of the
ADR-0020 contract rather than an implementation detail, and the naive
"period, space, capital" rule got it wrong in both directions:

- OVER-SPLIT: `e.g. "..."` is not a sentence end, but the quote looks like a
  start. The clause was cut in half and the corroborator stranded on the far
  side, so a genuinely dangling target silently demoted to SUGGESTION — a
  measurement taken and then discarded, the vacuous-green shape this gate
  exists to prevent. Seven such splits are live in the current corpus.
- UNDER-SPLIT: a sentence opening with a code span or a lowercase skill name
  was not seen as a start, so two sentences merged and a resolving target
  vouched for an unresolvable one it never stood beside — a hard FAIL with no
  escape hatch, which is the exact failure corroboration was added to prevent.

The splitter now excludes the five abbreviations that occur in routing prose
and admits a backtick or lowercase letter as a sentence opener. Applied
byte-identically to all three copies of the shared resolver.

Verified zero-delta against the corpus: 37 ERROR / 58 SUGGESTION / 2 dangling
before and after, findings byte-identical. The exposure this closes is to the
descriptions #99 is about to rewrite, not to the ones already measured — which
is why the deferral reason recorded on PR #103 ("can move the documented corpus
counts") does not hold and the fix lands here rather than after the retrofit.

Three regression tests, one per direction plus the backtick opener, each proven
non-vacuous by reverting the splitter alone and watching it go red.

Refs: #99
ADR: 0020

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 20:44:58 +00:00
79c9089122 docs: make the resolution contract match what the gate actually does
Both AGENTS.md and ADR-0020 said deployed .claude/.agents trees are consulted "only
when no authoring root exists". That stopped being true in f7cc279: the walk-up
finds a root in any git repo, so the condition is now whether that root holds
plugins, not whether one was found at all. Left alone, the two documents describe a
resolver that no longer exists — and this repo's prose is load-bearing, since the
next agent reads it instead of the code.

Both now also record why a name-count delta is not an equivalent test, because it is
the obvious simplification and it is wrong: a single-plugin monorepo re-collects its
own package, adds no new name, and would pull the deployed trees back in.

ADR: 0020

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015W3iwF9ncfRZddGBxsMCYi
2026-08-16 19:49:50 +00:00
ede3f06689 fix(kyberforge): restore the authoring rules the ADR-0020 trim dropped
Diffing each retrofitted SKILL.md against its replacement references/ files found
rules that existed on main and now existed nowhere — relocated in intent, deleted in
fact. A trim that loses a rule is not progressive disclosure, it is data loss with a
smaller word count.

Three had no survivor. The least-privilege guidance for `tools` kept its mechanics
and lost the "restrict to what the agent needs" half, so the remaining text read as
encouragement to omit the field. The improve flow lost its regression check, so
nothing compared the closing audit against the pre-edit state and a PASS quietly
becoming a SUGGESTION went unnoticed — restored on both halves of the author pair,
since agent-author had dropped its equivalent too. And agent bodies lost "would the
agent get this wrong without it?", which mattered more than it looks: ADR-0020
deliberately sets no body word gate for agents, three of the four already sit
between 933 and 1,199 words, and the delegation check only fires on procedure a
skill already owns. That heuristic was the only brake left.

Two more were reachable only from the wrong scope. agent-author tells the reader to
load only the file for the resolved scope, but the mcp__ glob syntax for
disallowedTools and the five tools no subagent ever receives had both landed in
project-user-scope.md. disallowedTools is the ONLY permitted fence at plugin/APM
scope, so the scope that needs the syntax most could not reach it, and a plugin-scope
run could write a body telling the agent to ask the user a question.

Two documents were actively wrong rather than merely thin. agent-audit told auditors
that validate.sh resolves boundary targets for skills only; it runs at both scopes,
so the auditor was hand-resolving what the script had already decided and could
contradict it. And skill-audit routed to its script-troubleshooting reference
whenever validate.sh "fails" — but it exits 1 on ordinary content FAILs, the normal
outcome for the whole #99 population, so 1,302 words loaded on nearly every audit.
A context-budget regression inside the skill that enforces the context budget.

Finally, two illustrations taught the shape the gate ERRORs on, unfenced, while an
adjacent rubric called it a hard ERROR.

LESSONS.md records the reference-chain depth rule flipping from "one level deep" to
"two hops, never three". ADR-0020 is silent on it and the reversal rode entirely on
the diff; the looser rule is what mandatory dispatch requires.

Refs: #99
ADR: 0020

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015W3iwF9ncfRZddGBxsMCYi
2026-08-16 19:49:38 +00:00
b0d6d08239 test: pin the nine ADR-0020 gate defects that shipped untested
Every defect fixed in f7cc279 was reachable because nothing asserted against it.
The gate had 43 assertions and none of them covered a consumer repo, a non-string
description, an unclosed fence, or the two spec ceilings. Each case below fails
against the pre-fix code and passes against the current one; every one was proved
non-vacuous by mutating a scratch copy of the script and watching the test go red,
independently twice.

The two that mattered most had no fixture anywhere. A consumer repo WITH .git is
the shape the resolver exists to serve, and only the no-.git case had ever been
tested, which is exactly why the blocker was invisible. And ADR-0020 says the
walk-up runs in two passes specifically so a nested .git cannot beat a plugins/
root further up — no fixture had ever placed a .git inside a plugin.

test-adr0020-differential.sh loses _non_adr_hook_error(). It excluded MAX_LINES and
MAX_WORDS from the cross-script comparison on the untested assumption that awk and
splitlines() agree. They do not, and the divergence stayed invisible for exactly as
long as the exclusion stood. The ceilings are now compared like any other rule.

Two existing assertions were repairs, not additions. The skill-improve probe had
been fixed by this very branch, so its iteration permanently took an
assertion-free SKIP that still counted as a pass; both branches now fail loudly and
each names the other file's pin so the two stay in step. And the yaml-none fixture
emitted `---/---`, which never matched the frontmatter pattern at all — it passed on
the bare word "frontmatter", present in both messages, while never reaching the
branch it was named for. Needles throughout that file now name their branch.

Refs: #99
ADR: 0020

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015W3iwF9ncfRZddGBxsMCYi
2026-08-16 19:49:15 +00:00
f7cc27908c fix(kyberforge): close the vacuous-green and consumer-resolution defects
Review of the ADR-0020 gate found four ways it could exit 0 without measuring, and
one way it hard-failed a repo it had no business failing. On a gate shipping hot
with no baseline, a silent pass is the worst outcome available and a false block is
the second worst.

Consumer resolution was the blocker. _authoring_root() fell back to the nearest
.git, so it returned truthy in ANY git repo; _collect_authoring_root() then
contributed nothing and the deployed-tree branch was dead code in precisely the
consumer case it exists for. A consumer repo routing to an installed sibling got an
unblockable ERROR, and deleting .git "fixed" it. It now keys on which of the two
walk-up passes matched. A name-count delta was tried first and is wrong: a
single-plugin monorepo re-collects its own package and adds no new name, so the
delta reads zero and drags the deployed trees — including a global ~/.claude — back
into the universe. That reintroduces the install-dependence ADR-0020 forbids, one
layer down.

The three silent passes: an indented `---` inside a block scalar truncated the
frontmatter and reclassified the rest of the description as body; a non-string
description was str()-coerced, so `description: true` measured as the four-character
"True"; and an unterminated fence blanked the rest of the body, disabling the
ERROR-tier references/ check and the gotcha counts.

Two measurement defects came with them. The awk line/word counts discarded awk's
exit status, so an unreadable file passed both spec ceilings in total silence, and
awk NR/NF disagreed with the audit script's splitlines()/split() on Unicode
whitespace — the "fix one gate, get blocked by the other" bug, on the two axes the
differential test deliberately excluded. Both counts now run in the Python block
that already reads the file. A type error also no longer reports itself as a syntax
error.

Also: glob metacharacters in the checkout path silently disabled the resolver;
re.I was applied to some extraction patterns and not others; agent-audit missed
`tools:` written as a YAML block sequence, the shape Copilot files use; and a
nonexistent agent file raised a bare FileNotFoundError instead of a diagnostic.

The shared resolver block stays byte-identical across all three scripts. Corpus
output is unchanged — 26 description FAIL, 9 body FAIL, 2 dangling, 0 missing
references, 58 SUGGESTIONs — so no documented count moves.

Refs: #99
ADR: 0020

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015W3iwF9ncfRZddGBxsMCYi
2026-08-16 19:48:56 +00:00
e7ebc667b3 chore(release): kyberforge 1.6.0, marketplace 0.4.2
The four preceding commits change `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/` content that reaches
the compiled artifacts — three validators, a new reference file in each of
`skill-audit` and `skill-author`, and the authoring rules across both author
skills — so per `apm-workflow`'s configure policy the package earns a bump, minor
for the new capability.

Root `apm.yml`'s `executables.allow` key moves with it, in this commit and not a
later one. apm approves a package's `hooks/` and `bin/` by an exact
`<name>#<version>` dictionary lookup with no wildcard and no version-less form, so
a `kyberforge#1.5.0` key left behind a 1.6.0 package errors nowhere: the entry
stops matching, the `SessionStart` freshness hook stops deploying, and the install
goes quietly stale. That is the failure ADR-0019 records as having actually
happened, and `check-executables-allow-sync` exists to catch it.

The catalog bump was missing from the working tree and is added here.
`apm-workflow`'s marketplace policy is explicit that an existing entry's
`version:` moving earns the catalog a **patch** — the set of packages is
unchanged, only its metadata moved — and that the root `version:` stays in step
with `marketplace.version`, since apm audit reads one and the compiled manifest
carries the other. Nothing enforces this: `apm pack --check-clean` catches a bump
made in `apm.yml` but never re-packed, while a bump never made at all fails
nothing.

Manifests regenerated with `apm pack` plus `scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh`
for `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`, which no apm output profile targets.
`.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` is unchanged — the codex profile's shape
carries no version field for either the catalog or its entries.
2026-08-16 16:42:46 +00:00
64ffb9f35a docs: make ADR-0020 match what actually shipped, and record what did not
The ADR was written against base commit `f9b919d` and then not updated as the
implementation moved, so several of its numbers were measuring one thing and being
read as another — the exact conflation the ADR exists to stop, reproduced inside
it. Corrections, all reproducible now that each figure states its method:

- The preload tax is 23,427 chars / ~5,900 tokens, not 23,612 / ~6,200.
- `MAX_WORDS=2770` is a density proxy for the agentskills.io ~5,000-token ceiling,
  not "2× p90". Neither percentile reaches it: 2× the body-only p90 is 2,698 and
  2× the whole-file p90 is 3,052. Reading it as a percentile pairs a whole-file
  gate against a body-only distribution.
- `apm-workflow` is a 421-word body; 554 is its whole-file count. `skill-author`
  and `agent-author` were 2,623 and 2,582 body words — 2,760 and 2,758 whole-file,
  which is where "within twelve words of the gate" comes from. Two numbers for one
  file is the point, and only one of them is what either gate measures.
- Every `file:line` citation now says it resolves against `f9b919d`, since this
  change rewrites most of the cited files.

Three things the ADR asserted that no validator implemented are now filed by tier
in an exhaustive enforcement table — deterministic, prose-pattern, or auditor
judgment — because a rule filed under "Enforcement" that nothing enforces is the
failure mode this ADR is most exposed to. The Gotchas entry count moves to
SUGGESTION to match the script; the paraphrase FAIL is marked as an auditor's,
since semantic equivalence is not pattern-matchable.

Two gaps recorded rather than quietly left:

- The agent body-gate exemption lives in `agent-audit`'s validator and in the
  `skill-size-check` hook's `SKILL.md`-only `files:` pattern — *not* in
  `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`, which measures whatever path it is handed and
  today reports 900-word body FAILs on `git-orchestrate` (933),
  `gitea-orchestrate` (1,199) and `apm-orchestrate` (1,080). Agents escape by file
  pattern, not because the script knows the difference, so widening that pattern
  would silently enforce a gate this ADR declines to set.
- The `skill-audit`/`agent-audit` merge is deferred to #101. This change made the
  split deeper, not shallower: the dispatch retrofit took them from 3 and 4
  reference files to 7 and 8, and their two same-named `description-quality.md`
  files now differ on 100 of ~120 lines after normalising skill/agent. The merge
  reopens ADR-0008 and touches every call site in `skill-author`, `agent-author`
  and `forge`, so it is its own change. #100 carries the dangling-target fixes.

AGENTS.md and CONTEXT.md take the same corrections plus the two live setup
changes: PyYAML is now a hard requirement rather than an optional accelerator (a
fallback that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file
it never measured), and `.claude/settings.json`'s `pretty-format-json` exclusion is
documented as load-bearing rather than as a tidy-up candidate.

LESSONS.md's autofix entry is corrected on its own provenance, which it got wrong
in both directions. `git log --date=iso` puts the introducing commit at 18:47 and
the fix at 21:54 — three hours, not "weeks" — and `git branch -a --contains` puts
the introducing commit on this branch only, not on main. It was manufactured
inside the same PR that diagnosed it. The added lesson is that "pre-existing" is a
claim about history and history is queryable: a defect found while working on a
branch feels inherited, and the feeling is not evidence.

Refs: ADR-0020, #99, #100, #101
2026-08-16 16:41:45 +00:00
d02765d595 fix(ci): close the RUN_TESTS_STRICT leak at its source, not at each caller
7607522 fixed the symptom in the wrong place. It made `test-run-tests.sh`'s
`run_fake()` spawn fixtures via `env -u RUN_TESTS_STRICT`, which stops that one
suite inheriting strictness — and leaves every future suite to defend itself the
same way. The variable's only job is done the moment `run-tests.sh` latches it
into the `STRICT` shell local, so it is unset there now and the leak is gone for
every child. The `env -u` stays as this suite's own defence in depth rather than
as the fix.

Two corrections to that commit's account of the bug, both overstated and both
cheap to have checked:

- The blast radius was two assertions, cases 10c and 10g, not six. Nothing else
  in the repo reads `RUN_TESTS_STRICT`.
- The pre-push gate was never red. It invokes `bash tests/run-tests.sh --strict`,
  and the flag sets a shell local that is never exported, so the flag spelling
  never leaked at all. Only the env-var spelling did.

That asymmetry between the two documented spellings is the real finding, and
nothing asserted against it. Case 10b compared the parent's verdict, which is the
half that already matched; the halves that differed were the environments the two
spellings handed every dispatched suite. New case 10i asks a child directly —
`${VAR+set}`, so an exported empty value still counts as a leak — and asserts the
two observations equal each other rather than a hardcoded expectation, so they
cannot drift apart in a direction the case did not anticipate.
2026-08-16 16:41:08 +00:00
311e7cd22c fix(kyberforge): reconcile the authoring rules the ADR-0020 trim left disagreeing
Six defects, each one a place where two files that an author reads in the same
sitting told them different things — or where the trim dropped a rule and nothing
noticed because no gate covers prose.

**"Use proactively" contradicted itself across the pair.** All three agent
templates said to add it where the runtime should delegate unprompted, while
`agent-audit`'s `KyberforgeCopilot.ProactivePhrase` rule grades it a hard FAIL in
any `*.agent.md` — which is the Copilot half of every project/user pair *and* the
vendor-neutral plugin-scope file, since that compiles to a real Copilot agent
downstream. Following the template produced a file the repo's own gate rejects.
The phrase is now permitted in exactly one place, the Claude Code `.md`, and
`references/contract.md` carries the per-file table plus the consequence authors
ask about next: a pair whose CC half has it and whose Copilot half does not is
correct, because `agent-audit` checks that both halves describe the same job, not
that they match word for word.

**The output-schema rule contradicted itself inside one file.** `contract.md`
said any content only one branch reaches moves to `references/`, and then offered
an "Output format template" body pattern with no qualification. Stated once now,
so it is not re-litigated: an output schema stays in the body only when every flow
produces it and it is roughly 50 words or less. No third option.

**Gotchas tiers disagreed with the script.** `validate.sh` emits the entry count
through `suggest()` and exits 0, while `skill-author` and `skill-audit` both
called more than five entries a FAIL. Whether a given gotcha earns its place is
judgment, so the prose moves to the script's tier rather than the reverse. The
paraphrase rule stays a FAIL and is explicitly marked as the auditor's call — no
script detects it.

**The dispatch exemplar was cited at the wrong number.** `apm-workflow`'s body is
421 words; 554 is its whole-file count. Both `contract.md` and `body-discipline.md`
cited 554 while describing a body budget, so an author calibrating against the
exemplar overshot by ~30% — the exact whole-file/body-only conflation those two
sections exist to warn against, reproduced inside the warning.

**"Error handling" came back as a required body element.** It was one of four and
is the one that gets dropped, and dropping it is not neutral: an agent handed
malformed input with no instruction invents a recovery, and a subagent's invented
recovery is invisible to its caller until the output is wrong. Restored in
`agent-audit`'s rubric as a SUGGESTION, in `agent-author`'s contract and both
scope checklists as a required element, and as an `## Errors` section in all three
templates.

**`skill-author` Step 4 gains the one check the audit misses.** An empty body
reports `PASS SKILL.md body word count 0` — a word gate cannot tell "concise"
from "absent". Step 4 now hand-checks for a non-empty section, and its commit
verification is conditioned on actually being inside a git worktree, which a skill
under `~/.claude/skills/` is not.

Also here: absolute repo paths removed from `skill-author`'s SKILL.md and
contract.md in favour of naming the skill (`zoom-out`'s description is quoted
inline instead of pointed at), the boundary-target universe documented to match
the resolver, a two-hops-from-SKILL.md limit on reference chains, and
`new-agent.sh`'s next-steps output naming the description budget and the
deliberate absence of an agent body gate.

Refs: ADR-0020
2026-08-16 16:40:51 +00:00
2540e50fcc feat(kyberforge): give skill-author a procedure for the #99 retrofit
ADR-0020 shipped its gates hot with no baseline file, so 26 of 39 descriptions
and 9 of 39 bodies are over their FAIL tier and editing any of them for any
reason requires bringing the skill into contract first. `references/improve.md`
said exactly that and stopped there — it mandated a retrofit and supplied no
procedure for one.

Four dry-run retrofits confirmed what that costs. Asked the same questions —
what to cut first, when a body is two flows rather than one, what else has to
change alongside — they invented six to ten different answers, so the same skill
retrofitted twice produced two different skills and neither run could be reviewed
against anything.

`references/retrofit.md` fixes the answers: an ordered cut list ranked by tokens
removed against behaviour lost (inverting that order is how a retrofit deletes the
instruction the skill existed to carry), the test for whether a body holds two
mutually exclusive flows, the reference-file conventions, the collateral checklist
for `README.md` and `references/sources.md`, and a worked description retrofit.

It also states the trap the dry runs kept hitting: retrofit the skill in place,
inside its package. The boundary-target universe is built by walking up from the
file being checked, so a scratch copy has no authoring root above it, the check
prints `INFO ... DID NOT RUN`, and the run still exits 0 — a line that reads as a
pass and is not one. A retrofit signed off on a copy carries an unverified
boundary target into the corpus.

Loaded from the improve flow only when a budget is actually exceeded, so a routine
improvement pays nothing for it.

Refs: ADR-0020, #99
2026-08-16 16:40:19 +00:00
a85bdbed42 fix(kyberforge): restore skill-audit's script-failure fallback and E100 diagnostic
The ADR-0020 body trim took `skill-audit` from 2,623 body words to a dispatch
shape, and two things went out with it that were not padding.

The manual structural fallback was one. Its replacement was a single sentence
telling the auditor to report an INFO when `validate.sh` cannot run — so with no
`python3` or no PyYAML, `skill-audit` reported the gap honestly and then audited
nothing structural at all. Every ADR-0020 measurement, the whole-file ceilings,
the name-to-directory match, the `references/` pointer check and the script
hygiene checks silently left the audit. A skill's whole Structure dimension
hanging on one optional interpreter is the same vacuous-pass shape the gate
scripts were just fixed for, one layer up.

The `E100 Runtime error ... does not exist` diagnostic was the other. That exit
code means an explicit relative `--config` was passed to `vale-wrap.sh` while
vale itself was installed and working; without the note, Step 1's fallback reads
exit 2 as "vale unavailable" and downgrades the description, body-discipline and
patterns dimensions to full LLM judgment for a config error it could have fixed.
That misreading is already recorded in CONTEXT.md as the reason both audit skills
stopped passing `--config` at all.

Both are restored in `references/validation-scripts.md`, loaded only when a Step 1
script fails — so the body pays nothing for them on a clean run, which is what the
dispatch pattern is for. The file also carries the by-hand boundary-target
procedure and the three ways to misread the result, including that
`INFO ... DID NOT RUN` is not a pass.

`references/file-structure.md` gains the one sanctioned spelling for a cross-skill
reference. The possessive form (``skill-audit's references/validation-scripts.md``)
is the only spelling both rules accept: a full repo path is what that section
already forbids, and a bare `references/<file>.md` is now a hard ERROR from the
ADR-0020 pointer check, which requires the file to exist in the skill's *own*
directory. Without the rule the two constraints look mutually exclusive.

Refs: ADR-0020
2026-08-16 16:40:00 +00:00
b6e68e9a2b fix(kyberforge): close the vacuous-pass paths in the ADR-0020 gate scripts
Three ways the gates could report green having measured nothing. All three were
invisible to a passing test suite, because pre-commit prints nothing at all for a
hook that exits 0 — a gate that declines to check and a gate that checked and
passed produce the identical signal.

- A UTF-8 BOM, a leading blank line, a trailing space after a `---` marker or
  CRLF line endings defeated the `^---\n` frontmatter matcher. Every ADR-0020
  check was then skipped and the file passed: measured at the time, a
  550-character description with a 1,000-word body exited 0 behind a BOM.
  All four shapes are now tolerated, and frontmatter that genuinely cannot be
  parsed is a hard ERROR rather than a silent skip.
- An agent file with a valueless `description:` followed by another key let a
  line regex capture the *next* key, which looked non-empty, so the
  missing-or-empty branch never fired and every gate below it early-returned on
  the empty folded value — zero output, exit 0, on a blocking gate. The one
  field this contract is entirely about was the one field a gate could fail to
  notice was absent. Presence is now decided on the YAML-folded value and
  nowhere else, and a missing or empty description is a hard FAIL in all three
  validators.
- The hand-rolled frontmatter fallback disagreed with PyYAML across the FAIL
  boundary on folded scalars, so which reader happened to be available decided
  the verdict. A fallback that mis-parses a scalar shape reports a vacuous pass,
  which is worse than not running, so it is deleted: python3 and PyYAML are hard
  requirements that fail loudly with an install pointer.

Boundary-target resolution no longer derives its universe from its own location.
A `${BASH_SOURCE}`-relative repo root leaked this repo's 39-skill universe into
every consumer repo running the hook through pre-commit, so a consumer skill
routing to `skill-audit` resolved against a plugin it had never installed. The
interim form resolved through `.claude/` and `.agents/`, which are gitignored
`apm install` output — the same commit reported 2 dangling targets on a machine
that had run the install and 6 on a fresh clone. Resolution now walks up from the
file being checked to an authoring root (nearest ancestor holding
`plugins/*/.apm/{skills,agents}`, else the nearest `.git`, in two passes so a
nested `.git` cannot outrank a real monorepo root); the universe is every skill
and agent under `<root>/plugins/*/` plus the file's own apm package and that
package's declared `dependencies.apm`. Deployed trees are consulted only when no
authoring root exists at all — the consumer case. One commit now gets one verdict,
which a gate shipping hot with no baseline file has to.

Narrowed in the same pass: a routing target inferred from the prose boundary form
and corroborated by nothing else reports at SUGGESTION instead of blocking. A
blocking check with no escape hatch is the wrong trade when the inference from
prose is the weak part of it.

New deterministic checks, all previously untested or absent: every
`references/<file>.md` a body names must exist (ERROR — a broken pointer is not a
style opinion); a description with no boundary clause at all, a Gotchas section
over five entries, and a Gotchas section over 25% of the body are SUGGESTIONs.
Where no universe can be determined the target check prints `INFO ... DID NOT
RUN` rather than passing quietly. Each prose-scanning check needed its own
false-positive fix — a fenced example of a Gotchas section was being read as the
section itself — and those fixes are pinned rather than assumed.

The resolver is one block copied verbatim into all three scripts between
BEGIN/END markers, because a cache-installed plugin's scripts cannot read outside
their own plugin directory. Nothing asserted the copies were still identical; a
one-line edit to a single copy passed every constant-agreement assertion, since
constants are not what drifts.

Tests land here rather than in a later commit. The existing suites assert the old
behaviour and go red against these scripts, so splitting them would leave a commit
whose own `run-tests` pre-push gate fails in isolation.

Refs: ADR-0020
2026-08-16 16:39:29 +00:00
76075223c7 fix(ci): unbreak the pre-push gate — strict-mode leak and apm-owned settings drift
Two pre-existing failures, both red at HEAD before ADR-0020 work began,
both invisible in an ordinary local run.

RUN_TESTS_STRICT leaked from the environment into test-run-tests.sh's
fixture children. The meta-test is itself a suite the runner discovers,
so under the gate's own invocation the variable propagated outer runner
-> batch_run -> the fixture's copy of run-tests.sh, flipping it strict.
Case 10c (a deliberate control asserting a skip is tolerated WITHOUT
strict) then failed. Six further cases were silently running strict too
and asserting against the wrong stream — case 9 was matching the stderr
strict block rather than the stdout skip list it was written to check.
run_fake now spawns via 'env -u RUN_TESTS_STRICT', so fixture strictness
is a property of the case, never of how the file was launched. No
assertion weakened; run-tests.sh itself is untouched.

pretty-format-json --autofix was re-sorting apm's output on the way into
every commit. .claude/settings.json is apm-owned (ADR-0018/0019) and its
exclude list named fifteen generated manifests but not this file, so
since 2e395a4 it has been committed in a key order apm would never write
— permanent drift on a file with an empty git diff. Content was always
byte-identical; only JSON key order differed. The exclude ships in the
same commit as the corrected file because otherwise the hook re-breaks
it during staging.

apm.lock.yaml: generated_at churn, plus lint's exec_status corrected from
'deployed' to 'gated_pending_approval' — executables.allow grants only
kyberforge#1.5.0, so lint's hooks/bin are genuinely gated.

New coverage: an ambient RUN_TESTS_STRICT must not reach a fixture that
did not ask for it, and under --strict the skip report goes to stderr
only with the stdout list suppressed. Neither was pinned.
2026-08-14 21:54:00 +00:00
36ba7a18f8 fix(lint): drop the stale hooks/hooks.json from the content mirror
plugins/lint/hooks/hooks.json was no longer produced from .apm/hooks/,
so check-plugin-content-sync failed on it at HEAD:

  DRIFT plugins/lint/hooks/hooks.json: stale, no longer produced from .apm/hooks/

Surfaced by running sync-plugin-content.sh --all during unrelated work.
Unrelated to ADR-0020; committed separately so the contract change stays
reviewable on its own.

Per ADR-0017's 2026-08-14 amendment, a hooks.json a sync no longer
generates is deleted as stale.
2026-08-14 21:13:25 +00:00
4a5c3c0cff feat(kyberforge): enforce the ADR-0020 context contract for skills and agents
Skill name+description pairs are preloaded into every session, costing
~6,200 tokens across 39 skills before any skill is invoked. The authoring
rules mandated that growth: skill-author:104 and description-quality.md:21
both required padding, while skill-author:102 (the deflating rule) had no
FAIL condition behind it.

Gates (blocking, no baseline file):
- description 250 chars SUGGESTION / 400 FAIL, measured on the folded
  YAML value
- body-only 600 words SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL, independent of the unchanged
  whole-file 2770-word / 500-line spec backstop
- every boundary-clause routing target must resolve to a real skill or
  agent; catches skill-improve, neuledge-context and gitea-labels
- agents take the description gates but deliberately no body gate; a test
  pins that absence

Vale: DescriptionOpener widened to ^This\b, new CompositionNote rule
banning architecture notes from descriptions. 10 hits, 0 false positives.

Kyberforge's own four skills retrofitted: descriptions 3,364 -> 938 chars
(-72%), bodies 8,306 -> 2,487 words (-70%), all via the apm-workflow
dispatch pattern. Fixes the skill-improve dangling route and the
agent-author misroute to manual review.

Also fixes a pre-existing false positive where any line-initial 'read '
was flagged as interactive input, which had already caused two scripts to
be rewritten around it.

Refs: ADR-0020
2026-08-14 21:13:13 +00:00
1c6eababb0 docs(adr): set a context contract for skill and agent authoring
Every installed skill's name+description is preloaded every session -
23,612 chars (~6,200 tokens) across 39 skills. The authoring rules
optimised for triggering reliability with no counter-pressure on size:
skill-author:104 and description-quality.md:21 both mandate padding,
while skill-author:102 (the rule that would deflate it) is
judgment-only and absent from description-quality.md's FAIL conditions.

ADR-0020 sets the description shape (trigger + one capability +
boundary), two-tier size gates sitting below the unchanged
agentskills.io ceilings, a mandatory dispatch pattern for multi-branch
bodies, a Gotchas constraint, an agent-side delegation check, and
invocation as a design axis. Gates ship blocking with no baseline.

Adds five CONTEXT.md glossary entries: preload tax, skill context
contract, dispatch body, hand-invoked skill, delegation discipline.

Refs: ADR-0020
2026-08-14 19:39:14 +00:00
2e395a4efa chore(apm): sync deployed install after apm update
Deploys kyberforge's SessionStart apm-currency hook into
.claude/settings.json (ADR-0019), bumps bin 1.1.2->1.1.3 and
kyberforge 1.4.1->1.5.0 in apm.lock.yaml with new exec_status
fields, and removes lint's now-empty .apm/hooks/ source dir
(the generated hooks/hooks.json mirror is untouched).
2026-08-14 18:47:33 +00:00